Social Contract 2.0 : Terms of Service Agreements and Political Theory
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
A Framework and Protocols for Service Contract Agreements Based on International Contract Law
Current protocols to agree to Web/Grid service usage do not have the capability to form negotiated agreements, nor do they take into account the legal requirements of the agreement process. This article presents a framework and a domain-independent negotiation protocol for creating legally binding contracts for service usage in a distributed, asynchronous service-oriented architecture. The nego...
متن کاملContract agreements via logic
We relate two contract models: one based on event structures and game theory, and the other one based on logic. In particular, we show that the notions of agreement and winning strategies in the game-theoretic model are related to that of provability in the logical model.
متن کاملKey Terms for Service Level Agreements to Support Cloud Forensics
As cloud adoption grows, the importance of preparing for forensic investigations in cloud environments also grows. A recent survey of digital forensic professionals identified that missing terms and conditions regarding forensic activities in service level agreements between cloud providers and cloud consumers is a significant challenge for cloud forensics. This paper addresses the challenge by...
متن کاملAgency, Cyberspace, and Social Contract
The social contract has been about rights and responsibilities in human societies. Facebook and its role in manufacturing and sustaining a global social contract, a new “we” is clearly one of the research areas that needs more attention. A new “we” is coming of age in the new age of connectivity and communication with a new outlook toward responsibility and rights at individual and collective l...
متن کاملSocial Choice Theory, Game Theory, and Positive Political Theory
We consider the relationships between the collective preference and noncooperative game theory approaches to positive political theory. In particular, we show that an apparently decisive difference between the two approaches— that in sufficiently complex environments (e.g. high-dimensional choice spaces) direct preference aggregation models are incapable of generating any prediction at all, whe...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Media Critiques
سال: 2014
ISSN: 2056-9785,2056-9793
DOI: 10.17349/jmc114208